![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| Chiung-Shing Huang, D.D.S., Ph.D. Pandurangan Harikrishnan, B.D.S., M.D.S., F.D.S.R.C.S. (Eng.) Yu-Fang Liao, D.D.S., Ph.D. Ellen W.C. Ko, D.D.S., M.S. Eric J.W. Liou, D.D.S., M.S. Philip K.T. Chen, M.D. |
|
Objective: To evaluate the changes in maxillary position after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in six growing children with cleft lip and palate.
Design: Retrospective, longitudinal study on maxillary changes at A point, anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, central incisor, and first molar.
Setting: The University Hospital Craniofacial Center.
Main Outcome Measure: Cephalometric radiographs were used to measure the maxillary position immediately after distraction, at 6 months, and more than 1 year after distraction.
Results: After maxillary distraction with a rigid external distraction device, the maxilla (A point) on average moved forward 9.7 mm and downward 3.5 mm immediately after distraction, moved backward 0.9 mm and upward 2.0 mm after 6 months postoperatively, and then moved further backward 2.3 mm and downward 6.8 mm after more than 1 year from the predistraction position.
Conclusion: In most cases, maxilla moved forward at distraction and started to move backward until 1 year after distraction, but remained forward, as compared with predistraction position. Maxilla also moved downward during distraction and upward in 6 months, but started descending in 1 year. There also was no further forward growth of the maxilla after distraction in growing children with clefts.
KEY WORDS:
cephalometry, cleft lip and palate, distraction osteogenesis, growth, maxilla