Manuscript Submission/Review Call for Reviewers Articles in Press Search Past Issues Current Issue Journal Home Editorial Office Editorial Board Cleft Palate-Cranofacial Foundation Contact Us Sponsors Cleft Palate-Cranofacial Foundation Editorial Office ACAP Homepage Cleft Palate-Cranofacial Foundation
[Full-text Article] [PDF Version]
[PubMed Citation] [Related Articles in PubMed]


doi: 10.1597/06-002
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal: Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 244–250.

Prevention of Orofacial Clefts: Does Pregnancy Planning Have a Role?

Peter A. Mossey, B.D.S., Ph.D., F.D.S., R.C.S. (Edin)
Janet A. Davies, B.Sc., M.Sc., M.P.H.
Julian Little, Ph.D.

Professor Mossey is Professor of Craniofacial Development, University of Dundee, Scotland. Ms. Davies is Research Statistician, University of Dundee, Scotland. Professor Little holds a Canada Research Chair in Human Genome Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada. Professors Mossey and Little on behalf of the ITS MAGIC Collaboration

Submitted August 2006; Accepted September 2006.

Objective: To investigate the association between pregnancy planning and orofacial clefts in the United Kingdom.

Design: Case–control study.

Setting: Scotland and the Manchester and Merseyside regions of England.

Participants: One hundred and ninety-one children born with nonsyndromic orofacial cleft, 1997 to 2000, and 247 controls.

Main outcome measure: Cleft lip with and without cleft palate, and cleft palate.

Results: There was an inverse association between planning for pregnancy and orofacial cleft in the offspring (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.33–0.79). An unplanned pregnancy together with smoking in the first trimester of pregnancy resulted in almost treble the risk of a child with an orofacial cleft when compared with those who planned their pregnancy and did not smoke (OR = 2.92, CI = 1.50–5.65).

Conclusions: Planned pregnancies were associated with a lower risk of orofacial clefts. Isolation of the elements of pregnancy planning implicated in these results is difficult. Current preconception advice needs to reach a wider audience; however, for maximum impact, efforts are needed to reduce the numbers of unplanned pregnancies.

KEY WORDS:case-control study, maternal smoking, orofacial clefts, planned pregnancy


© 2007, The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association