Manuscript Submission/Review Call for Reviewers Articles in Press Search Past Issues Current Issue Journal Home Editorial Office Editorial Board Cleft Palate-Cranofacial Foundation Contact Us Sponsors Cleft Palate-Cranofacial Foundation Editorial Office ACAP Homepage Cleft Palate-Cranofacial Foundation
[Full-text Article] [PDF Version]
[PubMed Citation] [Related Articles in PubMed]


doi: 10.1597/03-098.1
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal: Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 231–238.

Distraction Osteogenesis for Bony Repair of Cleft Palate by Using Persistent Elastic Force: Experimental Study in Dogs

Limin Liang, M.D., D.D.S.
Chunming Liu, M.D., D.D.S.
Rongfa Bu, M.D., D.D.S.

Dr. Liang is Assistant Professor, Dr. Liu is Professor of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Dr. Bu is Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China

Submitted July 2003; Accepted May 2004.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of closing a cleft and lengthening the hard palate by the technique of distraction osteogenesis with elastic forces and to evaluate the influence of the management on the facial structure.

Design: Thirty 6-month-old mongrel dogs were assigned randomly to two groups with five subgroups for different purpose.

Interventions: An 8- × 25-mm cleft was surgically created in the posterior hard palate in experimental and sham control dogs. Bone markers were implanted in the hard palate. Osteotomies were carried out followed by the installation of a distractor made of NiTi-shape memory alloy.

Outcome measures: The results were evaluated clinically, radiographically, and histologically. Anthropometric data that represented the length, width, and height of the maxilla were taken on the dry skull of the control and experimental dogs and were analyzed statistically.

Results: The cleft was closed and the hard palate was lengthened after 2 to 3 weeks of distraction in all the experimental dogs. New bone formation was found at the site of osteotomy. The variables of facial length, height, and width showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > .05). The length of the hard palate in the experimental group was longer than that in the control group (p < .01).

Conclusion: Distraction osteogenesis with the elastic device of NiTi-shape memory alloy is effective for closing the cleft and lengthening the hard palate in a canine cleft model. There is no interference on the growth of the maxillofacial structures with the technique.

KEY WORDS:animal experiment, cleft palate, distraction osteogenesis, maxillofacial structure, surgery


© 2005, The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association